Horizontal Rule

Disappointing Constitutional Court Judgment Still Opens Opportunities to Fight Segregation

2 September 2015

The Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic has delivered an important school segregation judgment. Although the Court refused to overturn a Supreme Court ruling finding no discrimination, the Constitutional Court established that judges cannot dismiss discrimination claims in education cases based on simple percentages.

As a child, Mr. Suchý was raised in state care (like so many Romani children in the region). He was forced to attend an elementary school designed for children with mental disabilities as he was told he could not handle the curriculum in mainstream education. When released from this special school, he pursued a requalification training to receive the mainstream elementary school leaving certificated allowing him to enrol in the high school. He successfully finished in 2005. He complained about being enrolled in the special school not because of his abilities but because of his Roma ethnicity, and he sued the Ministry of Education. The core of his case was whether and how discriminatory practices can be proven using statistical data. His legal battle has become one of the most visible cases of legal struggle against segregation.

In an unhelpful judgment, the Supreme Court had declared that segregation only exists, legally, if the proportion of Roma is above 50%. Yesterday the Constitutional Court ruled the Supreme Court was wrong to declare the 50% threshold for discrimination cases. They nonetheless found that in the individual circumstances of Mr Suchy’s case, there was no discrimination. In reasoning the ERRC thinks is questionable, the Court found that Mr. Suchý was not himself subject to a general practice of discrimination, given the number of times and intensity with which he was tested. In that sense, the judgment not only failed to condemn the widely-known, racially discriminatory effects of the Czech testing system; it also affirmed the failure to ensure inclusive education for all children in the Czech Republic.

“While we are disappointed that there was no finding of discrimination, the Constitutional Court’s judgment confirms our conviction that school segregation is more than just a question of number-crunching. Discrimination against Roma in school takes many forms, often insidious, and cannot be summed up in a single percentage or any other number. Courts must look more carefully than they, sadly, usually do.” - says Adam Weiss, Legal Director of the European Roma Rights Centre.

“The Constitutional Court raised an interesting legal question, challenging the general conclusion of the European Court of Human Rights that stated in the judgement D.H. and others v. the Czech Republic that in case of a indirect discrimination the circumstance of the individual cases are irrelevant. According to the Constitutional Court the assessment of individual circumstances may lead to the conclusion that the defendant rebutted the presumption of discrimination if an exception from the general discriminatory practice is established. Such a legal opinion surely deserves a further review” – argues Dr David Strupek a lawyer with whom the ERRC frequently collaborates, and who acted in the Suchý case.

Anti-segregation activists often rely on statistical data to prove school segregation, but the essence of segregation lies in the discrimination against each individual affected. It is about what education authorities are attempting to do and are actually doing to Roma children and communities by educating their children separately or differently. The ERRC will continue to press this line of argument in cases in the Czech Republic and elsewhere.

Background:

  • The Czech Constitutional Court in 1999 rejected the discrimination claim of 19 DH applicants, who consequently turned to the ECHR
  • 8 years ago the ECthR issued a judgment in the DH case in which it held that there has been a discrimination of Roma children in access to education in Czech Republic. The decision of the Czech Constitutional Court from yesterday confirmed this.
  • This is the issued the first judgement on school segregation since the ECtHR found country discriminating Romani children in education in the DH case.
  • Although the court did not find discrimination in this case, it nonetheless established that judges cannot dismiss discrimination claims in education cases cannot be filtered through any based on simple percentages.
  • Details of the DH case: http://www.errc.org/article/ostrava-case-dh-and-others-v-the-czech-republic/2945.

Further information and interview opportunities:

Szelim Simándi
simandi.szelim@xkk.hu
+36202658562
 

Horizontal Rule

ERRC submission to UN HRC on Hungary (February 2018)

14 February 2018

Written Comments of the European Roma Rights Centre concerning Hungary to the UN Human Rights Committee for consideration at its 122nd session (12 Narch - 6 April 2018).

more ...

horizontal rule

The Fragility of Professional Competence: A Preliminary Account of Child Protection Practice with Romani and Traveller Children in England

24 January 2018

Romani and Traveller children in England are much more likely to be taken into state care than the majority population, and the numbers are rising. Between 2009 and 2016 the number of Irish Travellers in care has risen by 400% and the number of Romani children has risen 933%. The increases are not consistent with national trends, and when compared to population data, suggest that Romani and Traveller children living in the UK could be 3 times more likely be taken into public care than any other child. 

more ...

horizontal rule

Families Divided: Romani and Egyptian Children in Albanian Institutions

21 November 2017

There’s a high percentage of Romani and Egyptian children in children’s homes in Albania – a disproportionate number. These children are often put into institutions because of poverty, and then find it impossible ever to return to their families. Because of centuries of discrimination Roma and Egyptians in Albania are less likely to live in adequate housing, less likely to be employed and more likely to feel the effects of extreme poverty.

more ...

horizontal rule