Horizontal Rule

Roma Children Pursue Final Appeal in Landmark School Segregation Case

8 May 2006

Applicants Seek Referral of "Ostrava" Case to European Court's Grand Chamber

Strasbourg, France, 4 May 2006-Eighteen Romani children forced to attend segregated schools in the Czech Republic filed their final appeal today in a landmark case before the European Court of Human Rights. The children asked the Court's highest body-the Grand Chamber-to review the case because of its potential to establish precedent and its broad significance for all of Europe's minority groups.

The case, D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic, seeks to end a widespread practice of discrimination throughout Central and South East Europe, whereby Roma children are routinely placed in schools for the mentally disabled regardless of their actual intellectual abilities.

In asking the Grand Chamber to accept referral of this case, the applicants noted that it raises several major issues concerning the prohibition against discrimination in Article 14 of the European Convention of Human Rights. At a time when Europe is struggling to address its growing racial and ethnic diversity, the capacity of law and courts to ensure equal treatment is of the highest importance.

The case was first brought before the European Court of Human Rights in 2000. In February 2006, the Court's Second Section ruled that although the Roma children suffered from a pattern of adverse treatment, they had not proved the Czech government's intent to discriminate.

"This request affords the European Court of Human Rights one more opportunity to demonstrate the vitality of the European Convention in protecting all Europe's minorities from discrimination," said James A. Goldston, Executive Director of the Open Society Justice Initiative and counsel to the applicants. "If this case does not amount to discrimination under Article 14, it's hard to see what would."

In recent years, the European Court has decided several cases involving Article 14 claims in the context of policing and criminal justice. The Court has had less occasion to address claims of racial discrimination arising in other fields of public life, including but not limited to education. This case presents the Grand Chamber with its clearest and most compelling opportunity to date to do so.

The applicants argue that the Second Section's restrictive reading of the concept of discrimination is inconsistent with the broad protection against discrimination increasingly afforded by European law. If allowed to stand, it would render Article 14 theoretical and illusory rather than practical and effective. This would be particularly inappropriate where, as in D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic, there exists overwhelming evidence that Roma have been treated less favourably than similarly situated non-Roma for no objective and justifiable reason. The evidence included (i) actual admissions by the Czech government that disproportionate numbers of Roma were sent to special schools-on the basis of tests conceived for non-Roma-even though they were average or above-average in development; (ii) corroborating detailed and comprehensive statistical evidence that Roma in the city of Ostrava are routinely subjected to educational segregation and discrimination; and (iii) consistent findings by numerous inter-governmental bodies concerning discriminatory patterns in schools throughout the Czech Republic as a whole.

Dimitrina Petrova, Executive Director of the European Roma Rights Center, which brought the case, stated, "Segregation of Roma in separate schools and classes remains a widespread problem throughout Europe and it must be addressed."

The request for Grand Chamber referral is available at:
http://www.justiceinitiative.org/db/resource2?res_id=102627

The URL for this page is:
http://www.justiceinitiative.org/db/resource2?res_id=102627

Additional information is available at http://www.errc.org and
http://www.justiceinitiative.org.

Contact: Dimitrina Petrova +36 1 413 2200 (Budapest)
Contact: James A. Goldston +1 212 548 0118 (New York)

Horizontal Rule

ERRC submission to UN HRC on Hungary (February 2018)

14 February 2018

Written Comments of the European Roma Rights Centre concerning Hungary to the UN Human Rights Committee for consideration at its 122nd session (12 Narch - 6 April 2018).

more ...

horizontal rule

The Fragility of Professional Competence: A Preliminary Account of Child Protection Practice with Romani and Traveller Children in England

24 January 2018

Romani and Traveller children in England are much more likely to be taken into state care than the majority population, and the numbers are rising. Between 2009 and 2016 the number of Irish Travellers in care has risen by 400% and the number of Romani children has risen 933%. The increases are not consistent with national trends, and when compared to population data, suggest that Romani and Traveller children living in the UK could be 3 times more likely be taken into public care than any other child. 

more ...

horizontal rule

Families Divided: Romani and Egyptian Children in Albanian Institutions

21 November 2017

There’s a high percentage of Romani and Egyptian children in children’s homes in Albania – a disproportionate number. These children are often put into institutions because of poverty, and then find it impossible ever to return to their families. Because of centuries of discrimination Roma and Egyptians in Albania are less likely to live in adequate housing, less likely to be employed and more likely to feel the effects of extreme poverty.

more ...

horizontal rule